Talan.tech
AI Risk Check/Stable Video Diffusion
VideoAI

Stable Video Diffusion

by Stability AI

Open-source video generation. Copyright/training-data lawsuits with parent Stability AI.

Relevant industries:Media

Risk Score: 17/100 (Low) · 8+ incidents · Legal 57 · Safety 0 · Privacy 0 · Regulatory 20 · Security 0

Risk Score

17/ 100
Low Risk

Apr 27, 2026

Risk Score Breakdown

Legal Risk

Court cases & lawsuits

57/100

Safety Risk

Incidents & harm events

0/100

Privacy Risk

Breaches & GDPR actions

0/100

Regulatory Risk

FTC, EU enforcement

20/100

Security Risk

CVEs & vulnerabilities

0/100

Incident Timeline

8 total incidents · showing 5 most recent

Apr 2026

LOWRegulatory ActionACTIVE
EFF: Speaking Freely: Lizzie OShea

EFF published a profile/interview of Lizzie O’Shea, an Australian digital-rights advocate. The provided text does not describe any regulatory action or incident involving Stability AI or Stable Video Diffusion.

#eff #privacy #regulatory

Dec 2025

HIGHCourt CaseACTIVE1:25-cv-00451
Court Case: Anders v. Stability AI US Services Corporation

A copyright infringement lawsuit involving Stability AI, Inc., Navarr Enterprises, Inc., and Jerry Anders was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The case concerns alleged copyright violations tied to Stability AI services.

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Aug 2025

HIGHCourt CaseACTIVE3:25-cv-06891
Court Case: Getty Images (US), Inc. v. Stability AI, Ltd.

Getty Images (US), Inc. and related Stability AI entities are involved in a copyright infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (3:25-cv-06891). The case concerns alleged copyright issues tied to Stability AI’s services.

Court: District Court, N.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Jan 2024

MEDIUMCourt CaseRESOLVED2:24-cv-00036
Court Case: Waseem v. Stability AI Ltd.

A breach-of-contract lawsuit titled Waseem v. Stability AI Ltd. (2:24-cv-00036) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The case has been terminated, with limited public details on the outcome in the provided record.

Court: District Court, E.D. Virginia#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Jul 2023

CRITICALCourt CaseRESOLVED3:23-cv-03481
Court Case: Hodes v. Mostaque

A fraud-related civil case involving Stability AI entities and individuals (including Mohammad Amad Mostaque and Cyrus Hodes) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (3:23-cv-03481) and is marked terminated as of 2024-01-05.

Court: District Court, N.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Stable Video Diffusion's AI risk score?

Stable Video Diffusion has an AI Risk Score of 17/100 (Low Risk). This score is calculated from 8+ documented public incidents across legal, safety, privacy, regulatory, and security categories.

Is Stable Video Diffusion safe to use?

Stable Video Diffusion by Stability AI has a low risk profile based on public data. Organizations should review the full incident list and conduct their own due diligence. This score does not constitute legal advice.

Does Stable Video Diffusion have lawsuits?

Yes — our public records show 4 court case(s) for Stable Video Diffusion, including: Court Case: Anders v. Stability AI US Services Corporation; Court Case: Getty Images (US), Inc. v. Stability AI, Ltd.; Court Case: Waseem v. Stability AI Ltd.; Court Case: Hodes v. Mostaque.

How is the AI Risk Score calculated?

Scores are weighted across 5 categories: Legal (25%), Safety (25%), Privacy (20%), Regulatory (15%), Security (15%). Each incident is scored by severity and type, then decayed based on age. Active lawsuits and fatal incidents do not decay.

Stay ahead of AI risk

Get alerts when Stable Video Diffusion risk score changes

New lawsuits, breaches, and regulatory actions — delivered to your inbox.