Talan.tech
AI Risk Check/Midjourney
ImageGenWebsite ↗

Midjourney

by Midjourney, Inc. · San Francisco, CA

Midjourney is an AI image generation service accessed via Discord.

Risk Score: 11/100 (Low) · 4+ incidents · Legal 43 · Safety 0 · Privacy 0 · Regulatory 0 · Security 0

Risk Score

11/ 100
Low Risk

Apr 16, 2026

Risk Score Breakdown

Legal Risk

Court cases & lawsuits

43/100

Safety Risk

Incidents & harm events

0/100

Privacy Risk

Breaches & GDPR actions

0/100

Regulatory Risk

FTC, EU enforcement

0/100

Security Risk

CVEs & vulnerabilities

0/100

Incident Timeline

4 total incidents · showing 4 most recent

September 2025

1 incident

Sep 2025

HIGHCourt CaseRESOLVED2:25-cv-08376

Court Case: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Midjourney, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California | #2:25-cv-08376 | Parties: Turner Entertainment Co. v. The Cartoon Network, Inc. v. Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. | Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement | Nature: 820 Copyright | Judge: John Arnold Kronstadt | Terminated: 2025-11-04

Court: District Court, C.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

June 2025

1 incident

Jun 2025

HIGHCourt CaseACTIVE2:25-cv-05275

Court Case: Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Midjourney Inc.

District Court, C.D. California | #2:25-cv-05275 | Parties: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. MVL Film Finance LLC v. Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC v. DreamWorks Animation L.L.C. | Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement | Nature: 820 Copyright | Judge: John Arnold Kronstadt

Court: District Court, C.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

January 2023

1 incident

Jan 2023

HIGHCourt CaseACTIVE3:23-cv-00201

Court Case: Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California | #3:23-cv-00201 | Parties: Gregory Manchess v. Kelly McKernan v. Adam Ellis v. Karla Ortiz | Cause: 17:504 Copyright Infringement | Nature: 190 Contract: Other | Judge: William Horsley Orrick III

Court: District Court, N.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

October 2022

1 incident

Oct 2022

MEDIUMCourt CaseRESOLVED3:22-cv-06499

Court Case: Midjourney, Inc. v. Fantastic Labs Sp. z o. o.

District Court, N.D. California | #3:22-cv-06499 | Parties: Wordle Inc. v. Midjourney, Inc. v. Fantastic Labs Sp. z o. o. v. Nicholas Sheriff | Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) | Nature: 840 Trademark | Judge: Araceli Martinez-Olguin | Terminated: 2023-09-21

Court: District Court, N.D. California#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Midjourney's AI risk score?

Midjourney has an AI Risk Score of 11/100 (Low Risk). This score is calculated from 4+ documented public incidents across legal, safety, privacy, regulatory, and security categories.

Is Midjourney safe to use?

Midjourney by Midjourney, Inc. has a low risk profile based on public data. Organizations should review the full incident list and conduct their own due diligence. This score does not constitute legal advice.

Does Midjourney have lawsuits?

Yes — our public records show 4 court case(s) for Midjourney, including: Court Case: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Midjourney, Inc.; Court Case: Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Midjourney Inc.; Court Case: Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.; Court Case: Midjourney, Inc. v. Fantastic Labs Sp. z o. o..

How is the AI Risk Score calculated?

Scores are weighted across 5 categories: Legal (25%), Safety (25%), Privacy (20%), Regulatory (15%), Security (15%). Each incident is scored by severity and type, then decayed based on age. Active lawsuits and fatal incidents do not decay.

Stay ahead of AI risk

Get alerts when Midjourney risk score changes

New lawsuits, breaches, and regulatory actions — delivered to your inbox.