Talan.tech
AI Risk Check/Macy's Face Recognition
Other

Macy's Face Recognition

by Macy's

Retail face-recognition tied to false arrests. Subject of misidentification lawsuits.

Relevant industries:Retail

Risk Score: 15/100 (Low) · 10+ incidents · Legal 48 · Safety 0 · Privacy 0 · Regulatory 20 · Security 0

Risk Score

15/ 100
Low Risk

Apr 27, 2026

Risk Score Breakdown

Legal Risk

Court cases & lawsuits

48/100

Safety Risk

Incidents & harm events

0/100

Privacy Risk

Breaches & GDPR actions

0/100

Regulatory Risk

FTC, EU enforcement

20/100

Security Risk

CVEs & vulnerabilities

0/100

Incident Timeline

10 total incidents · showing 5 most recent

Apr 2026

LOWRegulatory ActionACTIVE
EFF: Digital Hopes, Real Power: How the Arab Spring Fueled a Global Surveillance Boom

An EFF blog post discussed the growth of global surveillance after the 2011 Arab uprisings, but it does not describe any specific regulatory action involving Macy’s face recognition service. Affected parties are not identified in the signal.

#eff #privacy #regulatory

Apr 2025

CRITICALCourt CaseACTIVE25-1673
Court Case: Robert Weissman v. Clearview AI, Inc.

A lawsuit linked to Clearview AI (case No. 25-1673) is pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Limited public details are available on the claims or any impact on Macy’s face recognition use.

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Apr 2025

MEDIUMCourt CaseACTIVE1:25-cv-11009
Court Case: Forbes v. Macy's, Inc.

A lawsuit involving Macy’s, Inc. and individuals Kimberly Michaud and Jeffrey Forbes was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (1:25-cv-11009). Limited public details are available about the allegations.

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Aug 2021

CRITICALCourt CaseRESOLVED1:21-cv-03339
Court Case: Wright v. Macy's Retail Holding, Inc.

A lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia alleges that Macy’s Retail Holding, Inc. engaged in age-based job discrimination. The case was filed by Carolyn Wright.

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Aug 2021

CRITICALCourt CaseRESOLVED9:21-cv-81393
Court Case: Baker v. Macy's Florida Stores LLC

Macy's Florida Stores LLC and Janice Baker were involved in a civil rights lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case is listed as terminated.

Court: District Court, S.D. Florida#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Macy's Face Recognition's AI risk score?

Macy's Face Recognition has an AI Risk Score of 15/100 (Low Risk). This score is calculated from 10+ documented public incidents across legal, safety, privacy, regulatory, and security categories.

Is Macy's Face Recognition safe to use?

Macy's Face Recognition by Macy's has a low risk profile based on public data. Organizations should review the full incident list and conduct their own due diligence. This score does not constitute legal advice.

Does Macy's Face Recognition have lawsuits?

Yes — our public records show 4 court case(s) for Macy's Face Recognition, including: Court Case: Robert Weissman v. Clearview AI, Inc.; Court Case: Forbes v. Macy's, Inc.; Court Case: Wright v. Macy's Retail Holding, Inc.; Court Case: Baker v. Macy's Florida Stores LLC.

How is the AI Risk Score calculated?

Scores are weighted across 5 categories: Legal (25%), Safety (25%), Privacy (20%), Regulatory (15%), Security (15%). Each incident is scored by severity and type, then decayed based on age. Active lawsuits and fatal incidents do not decay.

Stay ahead of AI risk

Get alerts when Macy's Face Recognition risk score changes

New lawsuits, breaches, and regulatory actions — delivered to your inbox.