Talan.tech
AI Risk Check/Palantir AIP
Other

Palantir AIP

by Palantir

Advanced AI platform with privacy concerns

Risk Score: 21/100 (Moderate) · 17+ incidents · Legal 71 · Safety 0 · Privacy 0 · Regulatory 20 · Security 0

Risk Score

21/ 100
Moderate Risk

Apr 16, 2026

Risk Score Breakdown

Legal Risk

Court cases & lawsuits

71/100

Safety Risk

Incidents & harm events

0/100

Privacy Risk

Breaches & GDPR actions

0/100

Regulatory Risk

FTC, EU enforcement

20/100

Security Risk

CVEs & vulnerabilities

0/100

Incident Timeline

17 total incidents · showing 5 most recent

March 2026

1 incident

Mar 2026

HIGHRegulatory ActionACTIVE

EFF: Cindy Cohn on The Daily Show: Learn More About EFF, Privacys Defender, and Watch the Interview

About EFF The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit defending civil liberties in the digital world. EFF’s work to protect your rights on the internet is supported by over 30,000 members who have joined our mission by donating just this year. For over 35 years, o

#eff #privacy #regulatory

February 2026

1 incident

Feb 2026

MEDIUMCourt CaseACTIVE1:26-cv-01566

Court Case: Williams v. Anthropic PBC

District Court, S.D. New York | #1:26-cv-01566 | Parties: D-Wave Quantum Inc. v. xAI Corp. v. IBM Corporation v. Perplexity AI, Inc. | Cause: 18:1836(a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets | Nature: 880 Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Judge: Dale E. Ho

Court: District Court, S.D. New York#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

January 2026

1 incident

Jan 2026

MEDIUMCourt CaseACTIVE1:26-cv-00584

Court Case: Roots Informatics LP v. Microsoft Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York | #1:26-cv-00584 | Parties: Warner Bros. Discovery / Beechtree Diagnostics LLP & Beechtree Molecular LLC v. Palantir Technologies Inc., v. OpenAI, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc. | Cause: 28:1338pt Patent Infringement | Nature: 830 Patent | Judge: Laura Taylor Swain

Court: District Court, S.D. New York#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

October 2025

1 incident

Oct 2025

MEDIUMCourt CaseACTIVE1:25-cv-08985

Court Case: Palantir Technologies, Inc. v. Jain

District Court, S.D. New York | #1:25-cv-08985 | Parties: Palantir Technologies, Inc. v. Joanna Cohen v. Radha Jain v. Hirsh Jain | Cause: 28:1332 Diversity Action | Nature: 190 Contract: Other | Judge: James Paul Oetken

Court: District Court, S.D. New York#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

May 2025

1 incident

May 2025

MEDIUMCourt CaseACTIVE1:25-cv-00787

Court Case: C3.AI, INC. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims | #1:25-cv-00787 | Parties: PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. C3.AI, INC. v. USA | Cause: 28:1491 Tucker Act | Nature: 140 Contract - (Post Award) Injunction | Judge: Eric G Bruggink

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims#courtlistener #lawsuit #court-case

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Palantir AIP's AI risk score?

Palantir AIP has an AI Risk Score of 21/100 (Moderate Risk). This score is calculated from 17+ documented public incidents across legal, safety, privacy, regulatory, and security categories.

Is Palantir AIP safe to use?

Palantir AIP by Palantir has a moderate risk profile based on public data. Organizations should review the full incident list and conduct their own due diligence. This score does not constitute legal advice.

Does Palantir AIP have lawsuits?

Yes — our public records show 4 court case(s) for Palantir AIP, including: Court Case: Williams v. Anthropic PBC; Court Case: Roots Informatics LP v. Microsoft Corporation; Court Case: Palantir Technologies, Inc. v. Jain; Court Case: C3.AI, INC. v. United States.

How is the AI Risk Score calculated?

Scores are weighted across 5 categories: Legal (25%), Safety (25%), Privacy (20%), Regulatory (15%), Security (15%). Each incident is scored by severity and type, then decayed based on age. Active lawsuits and fatal incidents do not decay.

Stay ahead of AI risk

Get alerts when Palantir AIP risk score changes

New lawsuits, breaches, and regulatory actions — delivered to your inbox.